Special counsel Jack Smith and Judge Aileen Cannon are at odds over a crucial ruling regarding the disclosure of witness identities in the Trump classified documents case. Let’s dive into the details.
According to Law and Crime reports, Jack Smith’s team recently filed a court document expressing their dissatisfaction with Judge Aileen Cannon’s decision to deny their request for secrecy. They warned that if the judge didn’t reverse her order, they would seek an appeal. Smith argued that Cannon’s ruling was a ‘clear error’ that risked exposing witnesses to intimidation and harassment.
Smith specifically took issue with Cannon’s claim that discovery material under a protective order could not be shielded from public disclosure without a compelling First Amendment interest and narrow tailoring. He believed this statement was outright incorrect and would bring significant harm to the witnesses involved. Smith stated that these procedural and substantive missteps led to an erroneous conclusion by the court, and he implored Cannon to approve his proposed redactions and sealing.
In the court filing, Smith made it clear that if Judge Cannon didn’t reconsider her ruling, he would not hesitate to file an appeal. This ongoing dispute showcases the contentious nature of the case and the importance of protecting the safety and well-being of witnesses involved.
Stay tuned as we keep you updated on any developments in this important case on Fan Reviews News.
